Your Anarcho-Austrian Rant of the Day, By Adrian Gabriel
Speaketh Adrian Gabriel in re this article discussing the most recent dismal job report.
“Four more Wars….Four more Wars!!!” Sorry to rain on your parade Obamabots, but Obama is bad for the economy. He likes wars and drone striking innocent children, but no need to worry Romney was just like him. Romney wanted to expand the military state. Gary Johnson was no better, he seemed to think humanitarian killing was ok…whatever that means. Stop voting.
There are two strains of anarcho thought on voting. One, don’t do it because it’s inconsistent with the NAP (and besides, if voting really changed anything, it’d be illegal).. Two, given that nation states own individuals as ranchers cattle, vote either as a self defense strategy or a symbol, however unclean, of resistance to the shit show concocted by the two great statist armies comprising the 99% who didn’t vote for Gary Johnson. I voted for Gary Johnson, symbolically.
Understanding the effects of the “money-out-of-thin-air” methods of governments, sure would make people realize that every recession resulted in a longer bust period. Governments prolong the recalculation process with their intervention, and if it seems they have done something right, it actually reveals itself as a bubble or “false” boom. Whatever…it seems people have enjoyed this type of economic stagnation, considering they keep gobbling up the Keynesian and Monetarist unrealistic jargon. Learn some Austrian Economics you fools. Even though this guy’s blog here is very informative, he still also misses the dire effects of credit expansion and its harms on the economy. Interesting stuff nonetheless:
BUT WHO WILL BUILD THE ROADS? Stefan Molynieux knows. Roads, Part One. Roads, Part Two. Hit his tip-jar.
I enjoyed the anarcho capitalist discussion. The fact that it was recorded during a daily commute on a private road was interesting.
That a distinctions between marxism, republicanism, libertarianism and anarcho-capitalism was refreshing. However, it also points out the distance between the “foggy middle” and “extremists” who think about solutions to problems.
Oops, I intended to write:
“A distinction between …”